Sham Cultivation of Pokkali Rice Draining Public Taxpayer Money
KOCHI, Kerala, India - Sham cultivation to avail free government crop loss compensation is draining taxpayer money and undermining Pokkali Rice farming revival efforts. Eessential and timely Pokkali farm preparations are routinely delayed or ignored. Namesake sowing of seeds and spreading of saplings are carried out without needed oversight and monitoring. Crop loss at the spreading (Nirathhal) stage is claimed citing various misleading reasons to avail free crop loss compensation. Genuine farmers in contrast continue to cultivate and harvest Pokkali Rice successfully year after year in the very same farming environment without any issues.
April: Critical farm draining and drying window
Sham cultivations begin with the failure to drain Pokkali fields during the summer drying period starting April-14th as mandatred by the Pokkali Land Development Authority (PLDA) Directive issued every year by the DIstrict Collector. Proper summer drainage and drying are important for critical field preparation to mitigitate crop loss. Delaying this allows Prawn farming to continue into the Pokkali Rice farming period adversely impacting rice cultivation.
May: Essential field preparation is ignored
Several critical farm preparation activities are not undertaken in a timely manner by sham cultivators. These include mound creation ('Kanni Koottal'), water-channel preparation ('Thod Valikkal'), boundary clearing ('Chira Vettal'), sluice-gate repairs ('Thoombu Pani'), plugging boundary leaks ('Kallan Adakkal') and wild-foliage clearance ('Kadu Vettal').
Sham cultivators collaborate with officials of the Padasekharam Samithi, Krishi Bhavan Agriculture Officer and Local Self Government Panchayath to establish a bogus farm-draining date close to the onset of monsoon, often as late as end of May to undermine the PLDA order and enabling continued prawn farming. Free Pokkali seeds are the allocated by this group to sham cultivators with no prior year successful track record of Pokkali Harvesting.
June: Sowing and field management under scrutiny
Absence of adequate de-salting of clay mounds during the first two weeks of monsoon rainfall, setting of delayed Padasekharam-wide draining date for sowing to late June results in higher risk of crop failure. Seeds are sown only over a fraction of the farm area without adequate supervision to prevent flooding, bird damage, seed loss. Appearance of cultivation exists without the conditions necessary for a meaningful Pokkali rice farming until harvesting.
July: Spreading (Nirathhal) and crop-loss claims
Absence of needed supervision of farms to prevent bird pests and flooding results in stunted sapling growth and failed spreading (Nirathhal) outcome. This is then photographed and submitted as evidence of crop failure to the Agriculture Officer.
## August: Compensation claims and continued prawn farming
Sham cultivators submit claims for failed crop at the Nirathhal stage to the Padasekhara Committee which in turn forwards it to Krishi Bhavan Agriculture Officer. The Agriculture Officer visits the farm, verifies with a photograph, approves crop-loss compensation and transmits evidence of the farming attempt to the Fisheries Department. This evidence is then used by Sham Cultivators to facilitate continued year-round prawn farming instead of genuine Pokkali paddy cultivation.
Who ultimately pays?
Since compensation for crop loss or cultivation-related public assistance upwards of Rs 32,000 per hectare is provided to these sham cultivators where genuine Pokkali cultivation has not taken place, government taxpayer money is wasted year after year without any Pokkali cultivation. Repeated failure to produce genuine Pokkali crop harvest contribute to the decline of traditional rice cultivation, while creating bureaucratic documentation that may portray Pokkali cultivation in paper only.
Public money intended to support genuine Pokkali farming efforts for the revival of Pokkali Cultivation is instead enabling widespread misuse for year round Prawn Farming.
An independent, season-by-season audit and examination prior year Pokkali cultivations that includes examination of the following is urgently and critically needed to save public taxpayer money and channel it to productive Pokkali paddy cultivation.
- Actual dates of farm drainage and preparation - Padasekharam Samithi meeting minutes and cultivation deadlines - Distribution records for free seeds including seed variety data - Area actually sown compared with the- registered farm area - Agriculture Officer GPS-tagged and time-stamped farm inspection records - Crop-loss compensation applications and approvals - Payments made to individual cultivators with no record of Pokkali harvesting - Fisheries Department records relating to issuance of license for subsequent prawn farming - Actual Pokkali rice harvested and marketed by farmers - The duration of prawn farming following the alleged cultivation attempt
Protecting Pokkali's future
Pokkali represents more than a rice variety. It is a traditional coastal fullyh organic farming system adapted to saline wetlands and dependent on carefully timed agricultural best practices. Public funds intended for Pokkali cultivation should reach genuine cultivators and contribute to the revival of Pokkali paddy farming.
